Thursday, August 23, 2007

Gross: "Rescue the Homeowners..."

I think it is a noble thing indeed to rescue the home-owning people and so save America from errrr itself(?!?). But which home-owning people? Are two-home-owning people more deserving of a life-buoy than than one who owns but as single home? "Who" are we we saving "them" from? Faceless foreclosure? The bank? Chinese mortgage-backed paper-holders? Our pension funds who own mortgage-backed paper? Are the folk who bought stupid interest-only low-teaser-rate mortgages more deserving than the ones who simply paid too much and find themselves in negative equity? Should we save those that patriotically took out home equity loans following 9-11 in order to spend as they saw their patriotic duty? Or should we "save" those who continually withdrew equity from their homes to cruise the world or buy a plasma TV, such that, like Icarus, they simple consumed too close to the sun?!? What about the people, who deserved the good life, and in whose pursuit deservingly stretched to buy an extra 2000sq ft with pool, 3-car garage, and gallery ceilings, leaving no wiggle room for the inevitable "shit" that all-too-often happens in the course of life. Perhaps, the US gov't can recoup costs by having a 24-7 reality TV show that combined CourtTV with "Judge Judy" and "How to be a Millionaire " in a macabre publicized real-life drama showing precisely "how" they got there, and throwing themselves on teh mercy of the errr court/government/panel have you to see if they qualify for a "subsidized mortgage", "elimination of some principal off the loan", "temporary interest rate relief"," stay of execution in respect of foreclosure, or for the lucky few (and truly deserving) few, outright annulment of the mortgage loan, and award of the contested home free and clear.

But I will ask the question: Are not the savers deserving too? Perhaps the savers should unite and ask the government to provide them with some redemption for the lax fiscal policy and negative real interest rates that have spawned inflation in the real basket of goods and services one uses and consumes each day. It IS perverse justice that the prudent one's who save for a rainy day, and consider wisely, the possibility that something might upset the best laid of plans, and so do NOT borrow 6-times their income on absurd luxury that the less wise did, and who as a result were so stretched they could not afford to landscape in the first instance, nor now they can afford the energy to heat or cool the royal waste of space. Where is culpability or responsibility?

That there has been a large transfer of wealth from savers and the equally-weighted American to military contractors, leveraged asset-buyers and their intermediaries is undeniable. Perhaps, in similar fairness we should create a look-back tax that assesses the gains (some or many ill-gotten) made from the asset inflation and money illusion and redistributes it the ordinary savers and pensioners? We can call it the Sowood Tax in sympathy with Mr Larson's magnanimous gesture of returning previously-earned performance fees to investors following his Fund's recent debacle. America is not for wont of wealth, but is for wont of more disperse distribution of it. When however the distribution is sooo skewed, taxing the average to save the average citizen seem reasonably daft, given the enormous tax holidays and munificent gifts adorned upon the upper-most percentiles. Perhaps the time has come for more meaningful sacrifices that begins to tackle what almost every objective observer sees as a way of life that depends upon unsustainable consumption, encouraged by absent levies upon the many externalities this life spawns. The bubble, is perhaps in the American Way itself. And everyone sees it, but Americans themselves.

Rant over.


Anonymous said...

It seems there is just this huge irrational fear to let the damn market clear.....and it's not a fear that resides amongst level headed, cash heavy bears. No, that fear is on the other side of the isle. Alan, Ben, Paulson and all the magicians they champion act like the only alternative to continous inflation is a reply of '29, so it's really not a choice to them.
It's the damndest thing, all those who scream "Resliance" don't really belive at all, but rather keep printing and intervening away to "save" the structure. Problem is, the harder they try, the more real fat tail risk they create.
I for one believe that there are many who would be standing around to help it clear and turn things around, but sadly I have to endure the tag of Calvin, and debate whether or not to join the asylum.

Charles Butler said...

Allow me to add:

Finance any and all of the above mentioned operations with taxes on:

1).Subprime lenders whose business plans gave as much thought to durability as the designers of the Ford Pinto. (This now ex-post).

2). The cathode ray tube (and all subsequent forms of backlit display) and it's attendant destruction of the human attention span, not to mention peripheral vision.

3). Possibly the entire baby boom generation for its, so far successful, insistence that bad shit could somehow be effectively dealt with through the assigning of responsibility for it (Cargo cult meets Sigmund Freud).


"Cassandra" said...

RJ - Thanks. I was afraid that a brief missive on the more practical consideration of throwing a lifebuoy to the over-extended threatened to turn into a "runaway rant". I, of course, agree with your sentiments, in all respects. But "the bubble" runs deep, to the very core of American folks' sensibilities. The sad thing is: it it could be turned around with small effort, not egregious dislocation, and very little practical impact upon people's lives in modernity contrary the threats of going back to a "caveman" or "16th agrarian existence". This is same pathetic shite that scuppered universal healthcare during CLinton-I.

The market will do it to America eventually, and the whole process would be more orderly andmanageable with more sensible choice under the guidance of structured energy policy, consumption taxes, and more progressive sharing of the burden of moving a chaotic society more sanely into the 21st. "Rights and responsibilities" should be the emergant motto, NOT "Me Me Me bugger the cost to everyone else.."

Anonymous said...

Thakns for this beautiful post and your comment, Cassandra.

My poor english doesn´t allow my enjoying your technolecto, an irony, but go on.

Kudos to your blog!

James said...

Nice post Cassandra and anonymous. The world is changing and no one wants to except it especially those who currently reside at the top of the current political and economic structures. The global economy is heading towards a fifty year fat tail.

Anonymous said...

I'm ready with guns, cans of spam, and bathtubs filled with rainwater. Now can we get some more "When I was a young quant" stories with Deliverance-style background banjo music ...


Anonymous said...

"Wont" or "want"? That changes the meaning of the sentence considerably.

But really the root of the problem is structural. So long as capital is regarded and treated as the only "factor of production", to which profits, i.e. productive surpluses and their distributions, accrue, such that decisions solely concerned with its maximalization determine the disposition not just of the other factors as mere "resources" and the consequent distribution of social "wealth", but the possibilities of technical development, and so long as that is regarded as the exclusive organizing principle of political societies, then any "resolution" to a financial crisis is just a recurrence to the same. That might be hard to construe from the perspective of the financial system, in terms of which it is only the continuity of payments that is at issue, but it is the crux of the issue in terms of the "real" productive economy, from which the "value" of financial "assets" must ultimately derive. The expansion of the economy on the basis of ever greater accumulations of debt, as if profits could be simply minted in advance out of profits, the ever more intensive financialization of the productive economy, amounts to a doubling down in the short term on an inevitably unknowable, hence "riskless" future. And if the real world does not return the favor, is it the rest of the world that is to pay? Moralizing at times of financial crisis will hardly do, as if it were merely the best of intentions that have gone awry, or as if finally the wheat will be sorted from the chaff.

It seems to me that the underlying imbalances/power relations between the interests or capital, those of states and those of working populations and natural communities underlie the ever-growing excrescence of finanacial "assets", which ever so imperfectly transmit the balance of risks and uncertainties, never mind their inequities. The problem is not exclusive to the U.S.A. China's Gini coefficient is at least as bad. It's only that U.S. $ hegemony has permitted the debasement of the currency/externalization of costs in this particular epoch, (er, including those costs born by the American working class, ye old "silent majority"). Unless new ways are found to gather and transmit information and balance and regulate interests and constraints, reviving the financial system is just kicking the can further down that long, lonesome road. I'm not interested in separating out sinners from saints: it's a matter of altering, if not lessening, the burden of temptation.

Anonymous said...

Excellent post and superb comments. Thank you for talking about the herd of elephants in the room, it’s refreshing.


Anonymous said...



情趣用品,A片,AIO,AV,AV女優,A漫,免費A片,日本AV,寄情築園小遊戲,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色文學,色情,色情遊戲,一葉情貼圖片區,色情網站,色情影片,微風成人, 嘟嘟成人網,成人,成人貼圖,18成人,成人影城,成人圖片,成人影片,UT聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,080聊天室,080苗栗人聊天室,080視訊聊天室,視訊聊天室



麻將,台灣彩卷,六合彩開獎號碼,運動彩卷,六合彩,遊戲,線上遊戲,cs online,搓麻將,矽谷麻將,明星三缺一, 橘子町,麻將大悶鍋,台客麻將,公博,game,,中華職棒,麗的線上小遊戲,國士無雙麻將,麻將館,賭博遊戲,威力彩,威力彩開獎號碼,龍龍運動網,史萊姆,史萊姆好玩遊戲,史萊姆第一個家,史萊姆好玩遊戲區,樂透彩開獎號碼,遊戲天堂,天堂,好玩遊戲,遊戲基地,無料遊戲王,好玩遊戲區,麻將遊戲,好玩遊戲區,小遊戲,電玩快打

麻將,台灣彩卷,六合彩開獎號碼,運動彩卷,六合彩,線上遊戲,矽谷麻將,明星3缺一,橘子町,麻將大悶鍋,台客麻將,公博,game,,中華職棒,麗的線上小遊戲,國士無雙麻將,麻將館,賭博遊戲,威力彩,威力彩開獎號碼,龍龍運動網,史萊姆,史萊姆好玩遊戲,史萊姆第一個家,史萊姆好玩遊戲區,樂透彩開獎號碼,遊戲天堂,好玩遊戲,遊戲基地,無料遊戲王,好玩遊戲區,麻將遊戲,好玩遊戲區,小遊戲,遊戲區,電玩快打,cs online

情趣用品,情趣,A片,AIO,AV,AV女優,A漫,免費A片,情色,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色文學,色情,寄情竹園小遊戲,色情遊戲,AIO交友愛情館,色情影片,情趣內衣,情趣睡衣,性感睡衣,情趣商品,微風成人,嘟嘟成人網,成人,18成人,成人影城,成人圖片,成人貼圖,成人圖片區,UT聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室 ,哈啦聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,聊天室尋夢園,080苗栗人聊天室,080聊天室,視訊交友網,視訊

Anonymous said...

百家乐 轮盘 21点 德州扑克 百家乐系统 真人娱乐场 百家乐足球德州扑克 电子游戏 英格兰超级联赛 德国甲组联赛 意大利甲组联赛西班牙甲组联赛法国甲组联赛欧冠杯 英超 足球比分 足球彩票 体育彩票 即时比分 免費a片 a片 免費av 色情影片 情色 情色網 色情網站 色情 成人網成人圖片成人影片 18成人 av av女優avav女優 情慾 走光 做愛 sex H漫 情色 情趣用品 情色 a片 a片 成人網站 成人影片 情趣用品 情趣用品アダルトアダルト アダルトサイト アダルトサイト 情趣用品