Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Raise Margin Requirements NOW!

  • When you're driving too fast for safety, you slow down.
  • When deficits rise, you cut spending and/or raise taxes.
  • When someone is kind to you, you express your appreciation.
  • When an investment is no longer attractive, you sell it.
  • When inflation rises, you raise interest rates or tighten fiscal policy.
  • When bread is cooked you take it out of the oven.
  • When you cannot afford a discretionary purchase, you don't buy it.
  • When representatives govern poorly, you don't re-elect them, or their party.
  • When your political system ceases to function properly, carefully consider what is broken, and fix it.
  • When you have reasonable evidence that leveraged commodity speculation and physical hoarding by financial and policy investors is materially impacting prices and adversely affecting the Public Interest you should begin to react by RAISING INITIAL AND MARGIN REQUIREMENTS!! (oh and you might consider closing the loopholes that allow specs to obtain hedge margins and slap a "Tobin" tax upon transactions.It also might be worth exploring some cross-border harmonization too)


Anonymous said...

Now all we need is an adult on the playground. It's definitely time to chop the head off of this snake.

Anonymous said...

Nice post,

But the snake is the system.

They want to starve to death a couple of billions to restore confidence in the system.

A little late for Tobin taxes in this rotten world.


Anonymous said...

Speculation in commodities is only a symptom. Devaluation of the dollar is the cause.

tooearly said...

Cassandra: with small specs net shrt might that not work the other way around?

Anonymous said...

gold and silver margins have been raised a few weeks ago. last week the cftf raised crude margins 10% and what did it do? nothing. As you say, if the ICE doesnt follow, smart specs just move their business there..

Anonymous said...

Assuming that the crude oil price rally is due to speculation then why Platt's dated brent which to my knowledge is the best proxy for the spot market goes 1:1 with Brent futures ? Shouldn't we witness a contago situation?


Anonymous said...

Southwest Airlines is one of the few airlines hedging their fuel costs. They are able to hedge only a portion. The reason they aren't hedging all of their fuel costs (and why most airlines hedge little or not at all) is because of high margin requirements that take up too much cash flow.

Margin requirements on oil have almost doubled since last fall. Margins are reset reqularly as the price of the commodity goes up.

Recent CFTC studies, as well as academic studies ranging back 20 years, have consistently shown that neither speculators nor herding behavior are responsible for commodity price rises:

And it's a bad idea to raise interest rates unless inflation is caused by excess money supply. When inflation is caused by something like an inefficient use of available energy supply, you need a functioning economy to make the expensive investments necessary to make the economy more energy efficient.

All raising interest rates would do is charge the energy inefficiency to the people at the bottom, without addressing the energy inefficiency throughout the economy. You'd screw over the most vulnerable people to preserve the bad behavior of the rest. That would be sick.

Moe Gamble

"Cassandra" said...


Asking the CFTC to study the impact of speculators on futures markets is a bit like asking Exxon to study global warming.

Virtually any statistical study would be worthless since the "Commodities as an Asset Class" paradigm and the Ibbotson "You Gotta Have Oil " are very recent phenoms.

I agree that raising interest rates is not a formulaic response to inflation, though to be fair I did suggest either/or with fiscal tightening, and any event it wasn't the point of the post except to provide foil for the final point (which you still have every right to disagree with).

I am also uncertain as to your last point. As you might be aware, I've long been an advocate of whack-em regressive energy taxes (especially back from the days of cheap oil), not because I enjoy hammering the poor - for I am in reasonably left politically in favoring progressive taxation for broadly redistributive agendas, but because the less-well off are the majority, and the majority must change energy consumption behaviour until the advent of cold-nuclear fusion or Craig Ventner's bio-engineered fuel becomes reality, and the only thing an individualistic nation like Americans understand is the Price Mechanism. This is what motivates producers and consumers alike to consider the impact of energy use and the investment into alternatives. Ideally, the State would give it back to them via health coverage, better public transport, and greater economic stability and lower rates that should result from an economy in greater balance with respect to its sustainable use of resources and its ability to pay for those resources. America has chosen the route of penny-wise pound-foolishness in pursuing short-term consumption in lieu of long-term investment. THAT must be changed, but it is inherently painful and there is no alternate non-fairy-god-mother route. It probably cost the EC 1% a year in GDP growth, bu the the resulting benefits are now in plain view, both presently and going forward.

Anonymous said...

Interestingly, the case for increasing reserve/margin requirements is based on "leveraged commodity speculation" having negative price impacts and adversely affecting the public interest.
Leveraged with what?
Some people say too much money.
I say too much debt.
Unless you mean one-hundred percent reserve/margin requirements, you're just easing a bit the twist of the knife in the backs of US taxpayers.
Eliminate speculation with so-called borrowed money, which is debt created to feed the economically unproductive habits of financial services specialists: a.k.a. traders.
No leveraging.
Let speculators use their own money.
Let them bet against each other, rather than the American taxpayer.
See how far out they go.
And, how high.

Just a suggestion.

Anonymous said...

Just in case you didn't see this item, it's worth a look-

Anonymous said...



情趣用品,A片,AIO,AV,AV女優,A漫,免費A片,日本AV,寄情築園小遊戲,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色文學,色情,色情遊戲,一葉情貼圖片區,色情網站,色情影片,微風成人, 嘟嘟成人網,成人,成人貼圖,18成人,成人影城,成人圖片,成人影片,UT聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,080聊天室,080苗栗人聊天室,080視訊聊天室,視訊聊天室



麻將,台灣彩卷,六合彩開獎號碼,運動彩卷,六合彩,遊戲,線上遊戲,cs online,搓麻將,矽谷麻將,明星三缺一, 橘子町,麻將大悶鍋,台客麻將,公博,game,,中華職棒,麗的線上小遊戲,國士無雙麻將,麻將館,賭博遊戲,威力彩,威力彩開獎號碼,龍龍運動網,史萊姆,史萊姆好玩遊戲,史萊姆第一個家,史萊姆好玩遊戲區,樂透彩開獎號碼,遊戲天堂,天堂,好玩遊戲,遊戲基地,無料遊戲王,好玩遊戲區,麻將遊戲,好玩遊戲區,小遊戲,電玩快打

麻將,台灣彩卷,六合彩開獎號碼,運動彩卷,六合彩,線上遊戲,矽谷麻將,明星3缺一,橘子町,麻將大悶鍋,台客麻將,公博,game,,中華職棒,麗的線上小遊戲,國士無雙麻將,麻將館,賭博遊戲,威力彩,威力彩開獎號碼,龍龍運動網,史萊姆,史萊姆好玩遊戲,史萊姆第一個家,史萊姆好玩遊戲區,樂透彩開獎號碼,遊戲天堂,好玩遊戲,遊戲基地,無料遊戲王,好玩遊戲區,麻將遊戲,好玩遊戲區,小遊戲,遊戲區,電玩快打,cs online

情趣用品,情趣,A片,AIO,AV,AV女優,A漫,免費A片,情色,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色文學,色情,寄情竹園小遊戲,色情遊戲,AIO交友愛情館,色情影片,情趣內衣,情趣睡衣,性感睡衣,情趣商品,微風成人,嘟嘟成人網,成人,18成人,成人影城,成人圖片,成人貼圖,成人圖片區,UT聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室 ,哈啦聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,聊天室尋夢園,080苗栗人聊天室,080聊天室,視訊交友網,視訊

Anonymous said...

百家乐 轮盘 21点 德州扑克 百家乐系统 真人娱乐场 百家乐足球德州扑克 电子游戏 英格兰超级联赛 德国甲组联赛 意大利甲组联赛西班牙甲组联赛法国甲组联赛欧冠杯 英超 足球比分 足球彩票 体育彩票 即时比分 免費a片 a片 免費av 色情影片 情色 情色網 色情網站 色情 成人網成人圖片成人影片 18成人 av av女優 avav女優 情慾 走光 做愛 sex H漫 情色 情趣用品 情色 a片 a片 成人網站 成人影片 情趣用品 情趣用品アダルトアダルト アダルトサイト アダルトサイト 情趣用品